In the perpetual twilight of the deep ocean, far beyond the reach of the sun's rays, glide creatures of myth and legend. They are the ghost sharks, ancient and ethereal beings that have haunted the abyss for 400 million years, their lineage far older than the dinosaurs. With large, haunting eyes that have adapted to the gloom, and wing-like fins that carry them through the crushing pressures of the deep, these cartilaginous relatives of sharks and rays are the silent sentinels of a world largely unknown to humankind. But now, an unseen threat is gathering on the horizon of their dark domain, a menace born of humanity's insatiable hunger for resources: deep-sea mining.
The deep sea, once thought to be a barren expanse, is now understood to be a reservoir of biodiversity and a crucial component of our planet's climate regulation system. It is also rich in mineral deposits, formed over millions of years, containing cobalt, nickel, copper, and manganese—metals that have become the bedrock of our modern, green-technology-driven world. This confluence of unique life and valuable resources has set the stage for a monumental conflict, one that pits the burgeoning industry of deep-sea mining against the fragile, ancient ecosystems of the abyss. At the heart of this conflict are the ghost sharks, whose very existence is now imperiled by the looming prospect of industrial-scale extraction in their remote and mysterious home.
The Enigmatic World of Ghost Sharks
Known to scientists as chimaeras, ghost sharks are among the ocean's most elusive and mysterious inhabitants. They are not true sharks, having diverged from their shark and ray relatives around 400 million years ago, carving out their own evolutionary path in the deep ocean. With over 50 known species, they exhibit a remarkable diversity in form and function, from the plough-nosed elephant fish to the long-nosed and short-nosed chimaeras. Their appearance is as otherworldly as their name suggests: long, tapering bodies, smooth skin that can be black, pale blue, or brownish-grey, and enormous, often translucent-green eyes that are highly adapted for seeing in the near-total darkness of their environment.
Ghost sharks are creatures of the deep, typically found at depths ranging from 200 to 2,600 meters, where they live in close proximity to the seafloor. Here, in the cold, high-pressure blackness, they use an array of sensory organs to navigate and hunt. A distinctive club-like projection on the snouts of many species is equipped with electroreceptors that can detect the faint electrical fields of their prey—small fish, worms, mollusks, and crustaceans hiding in the sediment.
Their life history is one of slow, deliberate survival, a strategy common to many deep-sea species. They are long-lived, with some estimated to live for 30 years or more, and are slow to reach sexual maturity, taking over a decade in some cases. This slow-paced life cycle is a key factor in their vulnerability. Unlike species that reproduce quickly and in large numbers, ghost shark populations are slow to recover from any disruption.
Perhaps the most critical aspect of their biology, in the context of deep-sea mining, is their mode of reproduction. Ghost sharks are oviparous, meaning they lay eggs. After internal fertilization, the females release leathery egg cases, sometimes called "mermaid's purses," which they deposit directly onto the sandy or muddy seafloor. These egg cases can remain on the seabed for up to a year as the embryos develop, relying on the yolk for sustenance. The seafloor is, quite literally, their nursery. It is this fundamental reliance on the stability of the ocean floor that places them in direct opposition to the destructive nature of deep-sea mining.
The Dawn of a New Extractive Frontier
The push for deep-sea mining is driven by a global demand for minerals essential for the transition to a low-carbon economy. Electric vehicle batteries, wind turbines, and solar panels all require vast quantities of nickel, cobalt, copper, and manganese. Proponents of deep-sea mining argue that the mineral deposits on the ocean floor are not only abundant but also of a higher grade than many of the remaining terrestrial mines. They also suggest that deep-sea mining could have a smaller environmental and social footprint compared to land-based mining, which is often associated with deforestation, habitat destruction, and human rights issues.
There are three primary types of deep-sea mineral deposits that have garnered commercial interest:
- Polymetallic Nodules: These are potato-sized concretions of manganese and iron oxides, rich in nickel, copper, and cobalt. They lie unattached on the sediment of vast abyssal plains, primarily at depths of 4,000 to 6,000 meters. The Clarion-Clipperton Zone (CCZ), a vast expanse of the Pacific Ocean between Hawaii and Mexico, is the world's largest known concentration of these nodules.
- Cobalt-Rich Crusts: These are hard mineral layers that form on the flanks and summits of seamounts, which are underwater mountains. They are rich in cobalt, manganese, and other metals.
- Seafloor Massive Sulfides: These deposits form around hydrothermal vents, where superheated, mineral-rich water erupts from the seafloor. As the hot fluid mixes with the cold seawater, metals such as copper, gold, silver, and zinc precipitate out, forming large mounds.
The technology to exploit these resources is no longer the realm of science fiction. Several companies are developing and testing massive underwater machines designed to operate in the extreme conditions of the deep sea. The most common model for nodule collection involves a large, remotely operated vehicle (ROV) that moves along the seafloor, acting like a giant vacuum cleaner. This "collector" or "harvester" sucks up the top few centimeters of the seabed, separating the nodules from the sediment. The nodules are then transported through a riser pipe system to a production support vessel on the surface. Unwanted sediment and water are then discharged back into the ocean, creating what is known as a sediment plume.
Companies like The Metals Company (TMC), Global Sea Mineral Resources (GSR), and China Ocean Mineral Resources Research and Development Association (COMRA) are at the forefront of this new industry, holding exploration contracts and investing heavily in the development of mining technology. Transocean, a giant in offshore oil and gas drilling, has also entered the fray, partnering with mining companies and leveraging its expertise in deep-water operations.
A Collision Course: The Unseen Threats to Ghost Sharks
For the ghost sharks and the myriad other species of the deep, the advent of deep-sea mining represents an existential threat. The very processes designed to extract minerals are poised to devastate their fragile habitat. A recent study by oceanographers at the University of Hawai'i at Mānoa has highlighted the direct overlap between the habitats of thirty species of sharks, rays, and chimaeras, and the areas targeted for deep-sea mining. The research warns that this new industrial activity could significantly elevate the extinction risk for these already vulnerable animals.
The threats are multifaceted and interconnected, creating a cascade of environmental destruction:
Habitat Destruction and the Desecration of Nurseries
The most direct and brutal impact of deep-sea mining is the complete obliteration of seafloor habitats. For polymetallic nodule mining, the collector vehicles will scrape away the top layer of the seabed, removing not just the nodules but also the thin, bioactive layer of sediment that has taken thousands of years to accumulate. This process effectively strip-mines the seafloor, leading to the potential extinction of species that live on or within the sediment.
For ghost sharks, this is a catastrophe. Their egg-laying grounds on the soft, muddy bottom of the abyss are directly in the path of these mining machines. The leathery egg cases, which incubate for months on the seafloor, would be either buried or destroyed, wiping out the next generation of these ancient fish. This destruction of their nurseries poses a particularly grave threat to species like skates and chimaeras, which are completely dependent on the seafloor for reproduction.
Moreover, the polymetallic nodules themselves are not just inert rocks; they provide a critical hard substrate habitat for a host of unique and largely understudied species, including sponges, corals, and sea anemones. These organisms, which can take thousands of years to grow, would be completely lost, and with them, the complex ecosystems they support. Recovery, if it is possible at all, could take thousands or even millions of years.
The Choke of Sediment Plumes
The process of collecting nodules and discharging unwanted sediment back into the ocean will create vast plumes of suspended particles. These plumes can spread over large distances, far beyond the immediate mining sites, and persist in the water column for long periods. The impacts of these sediment clouds are numerous and severe.
For filter-feeding organisms, such as corals and sponges, the increased turbidity of the water can clog their feeding apparatuses, effectively starving them. The sediment can also smother benthic communities, burying organisms and altering the chemical composition of the seafloor. For ghost sharks and other visual predators, the murky water would reduce their ability to hunt and navigate in an environment where light is already scarce. The sediment can also harm the gills of fish, causing respiratory distress and increased stress levels.
Recent research has also raised concerns about the geochemical impact of these plumes. Experiments simulating the waste plumes from nodule mining found that they could lead to the release of heavy metals, such as copper, at levels that could be hazardous to marine life in the mesopelagic zone (200 to 1,000 meters deep). This means that the toxic effects of mining could extend far up into the water column, impacting a wide range of species.
A Cacophony of Noise and Light
The deep sea is a world of silence and darkness, and its inhabitants have evolved in this stable environment for millennia. The introduction of industrial-scale machinery will shatter this tranquility. The noise from mining vehicles, pumps, and surface support vessels will create intense sound pollution that can travel for vast distances underwater. Many deep-sea species, including marine mammals and potentially ghost sharks, use sound and echolocation to communicate, find prey, and avoid predators. The constant din of mining operations could interfere with these vital behaviors, with potentially devastating consequences.
Similarly, the powerful lights used on mining ROVs will introduce intense light pollution into a naturally dark environment. This can disrupt the behavior of species that rely on bioluminescence for communication and hunting, and could attract or repel animals in ways that alter the natural dynamics of the ecosystem.
A Fragile System Already Under Pressure
The threat of deep-sea mining does not exist in a vacuum. The deep ocean is already facing a barrage of anthropogenic stressors, including climate change, pollution, and the impacts of deep-sea fishing. Sharks and their relatives are the second most threatened vertebrate group on the planet, primarily due to overfishing. Many ghost shark species are caught as bycatch in deep-sea trawling operations, an indiscriminate fishing method that also causes significant damage to seafloor habitats.
The slow growth rates, late maturity, and low reproductive output of ghost sharks make them particularly susceptible to these pressures. Their populations have little resilience to increased mortality, and the added stress of deep-sea mining could be the tipping point that pushes many species towards extinction. A 2020 study on the extinction risk of ghost sharks highlighted that while many are considered "Least Concern" by the IUCN, this is largely due to a lack of data. This "data deficiency" is a major concern, as it means that species could be declining unnoticed and unmanaged.
The Global Debate: Regulation and Resistance
The looming prospect of deep-sea mining has ignited a fierce global debate, pitting economic interests against environmental protection. The body at the center of this storm is the International Seabed Authority (ISA), an intergovernmental organization established under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The ISA has a dual and often conflicting mandate: to organize and control mining activities in the international seabed area (known as "the Area") for the benefit of humankind, and to ensure the effective protection of the marine environment from the harmful effects of these activities.
To date, the ISA has issued numerous contracts for exploration, but has not yet approved any for commercial exploitation. This is because the "Mining Code," the set of rules and regulations that will govern exploitation, is still being negotiated. However, the process was thrown into turmoil when the Pacific island nation of Nauru triggered a "two-year rule" in 2021, a legal provision that requires the ISA to finalize the regulations or allow mining to proceed under the draft rules. Although the July 2023 deadline passed without the adoption of a final code, the pressure to begin mining remains immense.
In response to the growing threat and the inadequacies of the regulatory framework, a powerful global movement has emerged calling for a moratorium or a precautionary pause on all deep-sea mining activities. As of mid-2024, over 30 nations, including France, Germany, Canada, Brazil, and the United Kingdom, have joined this call, arguing that mining should not proceed until there is a comprehensive understanding of the potential impacts and robust regulations in place to protect the marine environment.
This call is echoed by over 930 marine science and policy experts who have signed a statement urging a pause, citing the risk of "large-scale and permanent loss of biodiversity, ecosystems, and ecosystem functions." Major corporations such as BMW, Volvo, Google, and Samsung have also pledged not to source minerals from the deep sea, and financial institutions are beginning to recognize the reputational and financial risks associated with the industry.
Proponents of mining argue that a moratorium would stifle the development of a crucial source of minerals needed for the green transition. However, a growing body of research suggests that the need for deep-sea minerals is overstated. A combination of improved recycling technologies, a shift to a circular economy, and innovation in battery chemistry could significantly reduce the demand for new virgin metals. One study projected that by 2050, up to 70% of Europe's clean energy metal needs could be met through recycling.
An Irreversible Legacy
The deep sea is the largest and least explored biome on Earth. Scientists estimate that the majority of species that live there have yet to be discovered and named. To begin a new, large-scale extractive industry in this realm, before we have even a basic understanding of what is at stake, is a gamble of monumental proportions.
The damage caused by deep-sea mining would be, for all practical purposes, permanent. The polymetallic nodules that provide habitat for countless organisms have taken millions of years to form. The ecosystems they support are characterized by extremely slow growth and recovery rates. Once destroyed, they will not return on any human timescale. We risk erasing millions of years of evolution for short-term economic gain, a trade-off that many scientists, conservationists, and a growing number of governments find unacceptable.
The fate of the ocean's ghostly sharks is inextricably linked to this debate. As ancient inhabitants of the deep, they are a living testament to the wonder and mystery of a world hidden from our view. Their silent, gliding forms are a reminder of the vast, unexplored wilderness that still exists on our own planet. If we allow the industrialization of the deep sea to proceed, we will not only be threatening the existence of these magnificent creatures but also sacrificing a part of our planet's natural heritage that we are only just beginning to comprehend. The unseen threat is no longer unseen. The choice is now before us: to protect the deep ocean and its ghostly inhabitants, or to allow the silence of the abyss to be broken by the roar of machinery, leaving a legacy of destruction that will haunt the planet for millennia to come.
Reference:
- https://seabedminingsciencestatement.org/
- https://www.arcticwwf.org/the-circle/stories/deep-seabed-mining-would-destroy-biodiversity-and-we-dont-need-it/
- https://farmonaut.com/mining/publicly-traded-deep-sea-mining-companies-2025-guide
- https://www.usgs.gov/centers/pcmsc/news/deep-sea-mining-and-potential-impacts-marine-ecosystems-new-study-highlights
- http://www.dulvy.com/uploads/2/1/0/4/21048414/finucci_2020_faf.12526.pdf
- https://www.sharktrust.org/chimaera
- https://a-z-animals.com/animals/chimaera/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_sea_mining
- https://www.texassaltwaterfishingmagazine.com/fishing/education/fishy-facts/chimaeras
- https://discoveryalert.com.au/news/polymetallic-nodules-importance-mining-2025/
- https://discoveryalert.com.au/news/polymetallic-nodules-importance-benefits-2025/
- https://news.mongabay.com/2020/06/deep-sea-mining-an-environmental-solution-or-impending-catastrophe/
- https://www.wri.org/insights/deep-sea-mining-explained
- https://www.geomar.de/en/news/article/researching-the-environmental-impacts-of-deep-seabed-mining
- https://deepseamining.ac/article/52
- https://marine-conservation.org/deep-sea-mining/
- https://deepseamining.ac/how_it_works
- https://deepseamining.ac/deep_sea_mining_equipment
- https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/11/10/1132
- https://discoveryalert.com.au/news/deep-sea-mining-companies-2025/
- https://deepseamining.ac/article/35
- https://deepseamining.ac/stocks
- https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/news/five-nations-add-to-growing-concerns-about-deep-sea-mining-at-key-international-meeting/
- https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/19/8110
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimaera
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28266010/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Seabed_Authority
- https://www.mining-technology.com/features/deep-sea-exploration-rights-under-international-seabed-authority-regulations/
- https://www.bastillepost.com/global/article/4921645-isa-advances-legal-framework-to-regulate-deep-sea-mining-preserve-ocean-governance
- https://www.pew.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/2024/01/29/deep-sea-mining-regulations-remain-far-from-complete
- https://deep-sea-conservation.org/solutions/no-deep-sea-mining/momentum-for-a-moratorium/
- https://deep-sea-conservation.org/solutions/no-deep-sea-mining/momentum-for-a-moratorium/governments-and-parliamentarians/
- https://news.mongabay.com/2025/06/madness-world-leaders-call-for-deep-sea-mining-moratorium-at-un-ocean-summit/
- https://www.landclimate.org/experts-agree-deep-sea-mining-is-not-worth-the-risk/
- https://www.dosi-project.org/wp-content/uploads/Senc-Policy-Brief-Marine-Conservation.pdf
- https://www.iucn.nl/en/story/the-impact-of-deep-sea-mining-on-biodiversity-climate-and-human-cultures/