G Fun Facts Online explores advanced technological topics and their wide-ranging implications across various fields, from geopolitics and neuroscience to AI, digital ownership, and environmental conservation.

DNA Detective Work: Unmasking Endangered Species in the Shark Meat Trade

Sun, 14 Sep 2025 23:42:40 GMT
DNA Detective Work: Unmasking Endangered Species in the Shark Meat Trade

I have now conducted a comprehensive set of searches and gathered a wealth of information on "DNA Detective Work: Unmasking Endangered Species in the Shark Meat Trade." I have substantial material covering:

  • The scale and nature of the illegal shark meat and fin trade, including statistics on mislabeling.
  • Detailed descriptions of various DNA techniques like DNA barcoding, mini-barcoding, eDNA, and population genomics.
  • The international legal framework, primarily CITES, and its appendices relevant to shark conservation.
  • Specific case studies from around the world (Australia, Brazil, Hong Kong, USA, etc.) where DNA evidence has been used in law enforcement and for prosecution.
  • The challenges associated with using DNA forensics, including cost, the need for reference databases, DNA degradation, and legal admissibility.
  • The broader conservation implications, such as the ecological impact of shark population decline and how DNA data informs conservation strategies.
  • Future directions in the field, including the development of more rapid and portable DNA testing methods.

With this extensive information, I am now fully equipped to write the comprehensive, engaging, and in-depth article of up to 10,000 words as requested by the user. I can structure the article logically, starting with the problem of the illegal shark trade, moving into the scientific solutions provided by DNA analysis, detailing the legal battles and successes, discussing the challenges, and concluding with the future of shark conservation. The gathered search results provide the necessary facts, figures, and case-specific details to create a rich and compelling narrative. Therefore, I will now proceed to write the article.

DNA Detective Work: Unmasking Endangered Species in the Shark Meat Trade

The Silent Crisis in Our Oceans and on Our Plates

Beneath the vast, shimmering surface of our oceans, a silent crisis is unfolding. Sharks, the apex predators that have patrolled these waters for over 400 million years, are disappearing at an alarming rate. These magnificent creatures, essential to the health of marine ecosystems, are being hunted and traded into extinction, not just for their fins, but increasingly for their meat. This illicit trade is a shadowy, multi-billion dollar global enterprise, one that thrives on obscurity and deception. But a powerful new ally has emerged in the fight to protect these vulnerable species: DNA science. In a global game of cat and mouse, scientists and law enforcement are now employing cutting-edge genetic techniques to unmask the true identity of shark products, exposing a chain of illegal activity that stretches from the high seas to the local seafood market.

The statistics are staggering. Since 1970, global shark and ray populations have plummeted by a catastrophic 71%, primarily due to overfishing. It's estimated that up to 100 million sharks are killed annually, a number that is difficult to comprehend and even harder to track. While the brutal practice of shark finning for the luxury of shark fin soup is a well-known driver of this decline, the global trade in shark meat has been steadily expanding, even surpassing the fin market in both volume and value. A 2021 report revealed that the global trade in shark and ray meat was valued at a staggering US$2.6 billion between 2012 and 2019.

What makes this trade so insidious is its pervasive mislabeling. A recent and shocking study conducted by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in September 2025 unveiled that an astounding 93% of shark meat products sold in the United States were either mislabeled or so vaguely described that consumers had no way of knowing what they were eating. Fillets simply marked as "shark," "mako shark," or other colloquial terms like "flake," "rock salmon," or "dogfish" are commonplace on grocery store shelves and restaurant menus. This ambiguity is not just a matter of consumer rights; it's a smokescreen for the laundering of endangered species into the legitimate food supply. The UNC study, using DNA analysis, found that 31% of the products they tested were from endangered or critically endangered species, including the great hammerhead and scalloped hammerhead. These species, which are afforded the highest levels of protection under international law, were being sold for as little as $2.99 per pound. This rampant deception means that well-intentioned consumers may be unwittingly contributing to the demise of some of the ocean's most threatened animals.

The consequences of this trade extend beyond the catastrophic loss of biodiversity. Sharks are keystone species, meaning their presence has a disproportionately large effect on their natural environment. As apex predators, they regulate the populations of species below them in the food chain, maintaining the delicate balance of marine ecosystems. The removal of sharks can lead to trophic cascades, where the populations of their prey, such as smaller carnivores and rays, explode, leading to the overconsumption of herbivores. This, in turn, can lead to the degradation of vital habitats like coral reefs and seagrass beds, which are essential for countless other marine species and for coastal communities that depend on healthy fisheries. Furthermore, many large shark species are known to accumulate high levels of toxins like mercury in their tissues. When mislabeled and sold for human consumption, these products pose a significant public health risk, especially for children and pregnant women.

The fight against this clandestine trade requires a multi-pronged approach, but at its core is the fundamental challenge of identification. Once a shark is processed—its head, fins, and skin removed—visual identification becomes nearly impossible, even for trained experts. This is where the power of DNA comes into play, providing an unassailable tool for law enforcement and conservationists to peel back the layers of deception and reveal the truth.

The Genetic Fingerprint: How DNA Unmasks the Illical Trade

In the complex and often murky world of wildlife forensics, DNA has become the gold standard for species identification. For the shark meat trade, where products are often processed beyond recognition, genetic analysis provides the definitive evidence needed to enforce conservation laws. Several powerful DNA techniques are now at the forefront of this battle, each offering unique capabilities in the fight to protect endangered sharks.

DNA Barcoding: The Universal Product Code for Species

At the heart of this genetic detective work is a technique called DNA barcoding. Much like a supermarket scanner reads a barcode to identify a product, DNA barcoding uses a short, standardized segment of an organism's DNA to identify its species. For most animals, including sharks, this genetic barcode is a specific 650-base-pair region of the mitochondrial gene Cytochrome c oxidase I (COI). This gene is ideal because it evolves at a rate that is slow enough to be consistent within a species, but fast enough to show distinct differences between species.

The process is remarkably precise. Scientists extract DNA from a sample—be it a fillet of meat, a dried fin, or even a shark-based pet food product—and then amplify the COI gene using a technique called Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). The amplified DNA is then sequenced, and the resulting genetic code is compared against a vast, publicly accessible reference database, such as the Barcode of Life Data System (BOLD). A match can definitively identify the species from which the product originated.

The power of DNA barcoding has been demonstrated in numerous studies around the globe. In Singapore, a major hub for the shark fin trade, researchers used DNA barcoding to analyze 505 shark fin samples from various shops. They identified 27 different shark species, 17 of which were listed as threatened by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Similarly, a study in Brazil used DNA barcoding to identify 17 shark species from 427 samples being sold in markets, with an alarming 53% being from species listed as threatened under Brazilian or international law. These studies, and many others like them, consistently reveal a dark reality: the marketplace is rife with the products of endangered sharks, hidden in plain sight under generic labels.

Mini-Barcoding: Tackling the Challenge of Processed Products

While standard DNA barcoding is highly effective, it can be challenging when dealing with highly processed products like dried and bleached shark fins, shark fin soup, or jerky. The harsh processing methods can cause the DNA to degrade into smaller fragments, making it difficult to amplify the full 650-base-pair COI barcode. To overcome this hurdle, scientists have developed mini-barcoding. This technique targets a much shorter, more stable fragment of the COI gene, typically between 100 and 200 base pairs. These shorter "mini-barcodes" are more likely to remain intact even in heavily processed samples, allowing for successful species identification.

A pioneering study demonstrated the efficacy of mini-barcoding by reliably identifying processed fins from seven of the eight CITES-listed shark species at the time. The same study even managed to identify the species or genus of origin in over 60% of shark fin soup samples tested. Mini-barcoding has also been successfully applied to other challenging products, such as shark liver oil and even pet food, revealing the hidden presence of endangered species like the hammerhead shark.

Beyond Barcoding: Enhancing Accuracy with Multiple Markers

To further enhance the accuracy of identification, especially in cases where closely related species have very similar COI barcodes, scientists often employ a multi-marker approach. This involves sequencing additional genetic markers alongside the standard COI barcode. The NADH2 gene, another mitochondrial gene, is frequently used in conjunction with COI to provide a more robust and reliable identification. By using two or more genetic markers, scientists can create a more detailed genetic profile, allowing for finer-scale discrimination between species and reducing the chances of misidentification due to natural genetic variation or hybridization. This multi-marker strategy was effectively used in a study of shark meat products in Italy, where the combination of COI and NADH2 sequencing provided accurate and reliable discrimination of shark samples, uncovering widespread mislabeling.

Environmental DNA (eDNA): Detecting Sharks Without Seeing Them

One of the most innovative and promising frontiers in shark conservation is the use of environmental DNA (eDNA). All organisms, including sharks, constantly shed genetic material into their environment in the form of skin cells, mucus, feces, and other bodily fluids. Scientists can now collect water samples from the ocean and filter them to capture this trace DNA. Using highly sensitive techniques like species-specific PCR or metabarcoding, they can then identify the species that have recently been in that area.

eDNA offers a non-invasive, cost-effective, and powerful tool for monitoring shark populations, especially for rare and elusive species that are difficult to survey using traditional methods like visual counts or fishing surveys. It can help scientists understand the distribution, habitat use, and migratory patterns of sharks, providing crucial data for designing effective marine protected areas and other conservation strategies. For example, eDNA has been used to detect the presence of critically endangered white sharks in the Mediterranean Sea, a region where they are rarely sighted. By analyzing water samples, researchers can identify key habitats and aggregation sites, allowing for targeted conservation efforts. While still a developing field, eDNA holds immense potential to revolutionize how we study and protect shark populations on a large scale.

Population Genomics: Tracing the Origins of the Trade

Beyond simply identifying the species, scientists are now using population genomics to trace the geographic origin of traded shark products. By analyzing thousands of genetic markers across the entire genome, researchers can identify distinct populations of the same shark species. This is because shark populations in different parts of the world, while the same species, often have subtle genetic differences due to limited interbreeding.

This level of detail is a game-changer for law enforcement. By creating a genetic reference map of shark populations, scientists can analyze a seized fin or piece of meat and determine not just that it's from a protected species, but also from which specific region of the world it was likely poached. This information can help to pinpoint illegal fishing hotspots and dismantle international trafficking networks. Population genomics can also provide critical insights for conservation management, such as identifying distinct population units that require separate management strategies to ensure their long-term survival.

Together, these DNA-based tools form a powerful forensic arsenal. From the broad-strokes identification of species through barcoding to the fine-scale tracking of populations through genomics, DNA detective work is shining a harsh light on the dark corners of the illegal shark trade, providing the irrefutable evidence needed to hold criminals accountable and protect the future of these vital ocean predators.

The Gavel Falls: DNA in the Courtroom

The scientific power of DNA analysis is only as impactful as its application in the real world of law enforcement and justice. Fortunately, the genetic evidence uncovered in labs is increasingly being used to build robust legal cases against those involved in the illegal shark trade, leading to successful prosecutions and significant seizures of illicit products. These legal victories, built on the back of irrefutable DNA evidence, are sending a clear message to traffickers that the days of hiding behind mislabeled products and processed fins are numbered.

Landmark Cases and Legal Precedents

One of the most compelling examples of DNA evidence in action comes from Australia. In a case that set a significant precedent, the Australian Museum's DNA laboratory was called upon by fisheries authorities to identify a large seizure of illegally held shark fins. Using DNA techniques, the scientists were able to identify fins from a multitude of Australian shark species, including some listed as vulnerable or near-threatened. In one particular seizure from a Commonwealth vessel in 2006, DNA analysis revealed that the fins belonged to no fewer than 22 individual sharks. This concrete evidence was instrumental in the prosecution of the case, resulting in the defendants being convicted and collectively fined more than $23,000—a substantial penalty for the illegal trafficking of wildlife that serves as a powerful deterrent.

In Brazil, a global hotspot for elasmobranch conservation, DNA-based identification has been crucial in exposing the scale of the illegal trade. In one investigation, researchers used DNA analysis to identify species from three separate illegal shark fin seizures. From a total of 747 fins, they identified at least 20 different species. Many of these were endangered and protected under Brazilian law, while others were subject to international trade restrictions under CITES. These findings provided concrete evidence of environmental crimes being committed by local fisheries and highlighted the indispensable role of molecular identification for law enforcement when dealing with processed carcasses that lack any identifying morphological features.

The bustling markets of Hong Kong, one of the world's largest shark fin trade hubs, have also become a key battleground where DNA evidence is being deployed. In a large-scale study, researchers conducted DNA testing on thousands of fin trimmings from markets in Hong Kong and southern China. Their work revealed that over 70% of the species in the trade are at risk of extinction. This data is not just academically significant; it provides law enforcement with the intelligence needed to target their efforts and scrutinize shipments that are more likely to contain illegal products.

From the Lab to the Port: Rapid DNA Testing for Real-Time Enforcement

A major challenge for customs officials is the sheer volume of trade and the speed at which they must process shipments, often within 24 hours. Traditional DNA analysis, which can take days or weeks, is often too slow to be practical in a busy port environment. To address this, scientists have developed rapid, field-based DNA testing protocols. These "in-port" DNA tools can provide results in a matter of hours, allowing officials to quickly screen suspicious shipments.

A groundbreaking multiplex real-time PCR protocol, for instance, can detect nine of the twelve most commonly traded CITES-listed shark species in a single reaction, in less than four hours, and at a cost of less than a dollar per sample. This rapid test doesn't necessarily identify the specific species, but it gives a clear positive or negative result for the presence of a CITES-listed shark. A positive result provides the probable cause needed to detain a shipment for more detailed and robust forensic analysis, which can then be used in a legal case. These rapid testing kits have been successfully implemented in Hong Kong, empowering customs officials with a powerful new tool to clamp down on the illegal trade.

Similarly, in Colombia, a researcher from Florida International University has worked with local law enforcement to install in-port DNA detection tools to combat the illegal trade of sharks and freshwater turtles. Using these tools, authorities can determine in a matter of hours if a shipment of steaks is from a shark or if a turtle came from a protected region. This timely evidence is often the key to moving a prosecution forward, preventing crimes from going unnoticed or unprocessed.

The Legal Framework: CITES and the Regulation of the Shark Trade

The primary international agreement that governs the trade in endangered species is the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). With 184 member countries, CITES provides a legal framework to ensure that international trade in wild animals and plants does not threaten their survival. Species are listed in one of three Appendices, each affording a different level of protection.

  • Appendix I includes species threatened with extinction. International commercial trade in these species is generally prohibited.
  • Appendix II includes species that are not necessarily threatened with extinction now, but may become so unless trade is closely controlled. Trade in Appendix II species is allowed but must be accompanied by a CITES permit, which is only granted if the exporting country can prove that the trade is not detrimental to the survival of the species in the wild (a "non-detriment finding") and that the specimens were legally acquired.
  • Appendix III includes species that are protected in at least one country, which has then asked other CITES Parties for assistance in controlling the trade.

Over the past decade, there has been a growing recognition of the plight of sharks, and a significant number of species have been added to CITES Appendix II. In a landmark decision at the CITES Conference of the Parties in 2023, the entire family of requiem sharks (Carcharhinidae), which includes some 60 species like tiger sharks, bull sharks, and blue sharks, was added to Appendix II. This, along with previous listings of hammerhead sharks, mako sharks, and others, means that a substantial portion of the international shark trade is now subject to CITES regulations.

These listings are a monumental step forward for shark conservation, but their effectiveness hinges on robust enforcement. This is where DNA evidence is critical. It provides the scientific proof needed for customs officials and law enforcement agencies to verify that shipments are what they claim to be and to detect illegal trade in CITES-listed species. When a CITES document for a shipment of shark fins claims to contain only non-listed species, a DNA test can quickly reveal if protected species are being smuggled within the shipment, providing the basis for seizure and prosecution.

The combination of a strong international legal framework like CITES and powerful forensic tools like DNA analysis creates a formidable defense against the illegal shark trade. As more shark species are brought under the protection of CITES and as DNA testing becomes more accessible and rapid, the legal risks for traffickers will continue to rise, hopefully tipping the scales in favor of the sharks.

The Hurdles in the Hunt: Challenges and Limitations of DNA Detective Work

While DNA analysis has proven to be a revolutionary tool in the fight against the illegal shark trade, its path from a crime scene—be it a fishing vessel on the high seas or a market stall in a bustling city—to a conviction in a court of law is fraught with challenges. The journey of a DNA sample is a complex one, and a number of scientific, logistical, and legal hurdles must be overcome for this powerful technology to reach its full potential in shark conservation.

The Degradation of Evidence: A Race Against Time

One of the most significant scientific challenges is the degradation of DNA. In many cases, by the time law enforcement encounters shark products, they have been subjected to harsh processing. Fins may be dried, bleached, or boiled for soup, while meat can be frozen, salted, or cooked. These processes can break down DNA molecules into smaller, fragmented pieces, making it difficult for scientists to extract a usable sample and amplify the standard, full-length DNA barcode. This is particularly problematic in the hot and humid conditions often found in the ports and markets where the shark trade flourishes.

To counter this, scientists have developed techniques like mini-barcoding, which targets smaller DNA fragments. However, even these methods have their limits, and in some cases, the DNA can be so degraded that no identification is possible. This was seen in a real-world law enforcement scenario in Hong Kong, where three large fins that were visually identified as being from CITES-listed species failed to amplify with both rapid PCR and standard barcoding analysis, likely due to severe DNA degradation.

The Incomplete Library: The Critical Need for Comprehensive Reference Databases

A DNA sequence is meaningless without a comprehensive and accurately curated reference database to compare it against. While databases like the Barcode of Life Data System (BOLD) are vast and growing, they are far from complete. For DNA barcoding to be a truly effective forensic tool, these databases must contain verified reference sequences from all known shark species. If a sequence from a seized product does not have a match in the database, or if the reference sequences are inaccurate, a definitive identification cannot be made.

This is a particular challenge for the many rare and cryptic shark species, for which reference samples may not have been collected and sequenced. Building these reference libraries is a massive undertaking, requiring global collaboration between taxonomists, geneticists, museums, and fisheries agencies to collect, identify, and sequence specimens from around the world. The accuracy of these databases is paramount, as any errors can undermine the credibility of the DNA evidence in a legal setting.

The High Cost of Justice: The Financial Barrier to Widespread Use

While the cost of DNA sequencing has decreased dramatically over the past two decades, it can still be a significant financial barrier, especially for developing countries, which are often on the front lines of the illegal shark trade. The equipment, reagents, and trained personnel required to run a DNA forensics lab are expensive. Even with more affordable, rapid testing kits, the cost can add up when screening the thousands of fins that can be found in a single large shipment. A 2006 analysis estimated that the cost of barcoding a single sample, including labor, could be around US$5.00. While this may seem small, for a busy port like those in Australia, which may intercept 20,000 specimens a year, the costs can quickly become substantial.

This financial reality means that DNA testing is often used sparingly, and in many parts of the world, the capacity to perform this kind of analysis is simply non-existent. This creates a significant gap in enforcement, allowing the illegal trade to continue unabated in many regions.

The Legal Gauntlet: Admissibility in Court

For DNA evidence to be used in a prosecution, it must be deemed admissible by the court. This involves a rigorous process of legal and scientific scrutiny. The defense can challenge the evidence on a number of grounds, including:

  • Chain of Custody: Prosecutors must be able to demonstrate an unbroken chain of custody for the sample, from the moment it was seized to the time it was analyzed in the lab, to ensure it wasn't tampered with or contaminated.
  • Scientific Validity: The DNA testing method itself must be scientifically valid and generally accepted within the scientific community. While DNA barcoding is well-established, newer techniques may face greater scrutiny.
  • Laboratory Standards: The laboratory that conducted the analysis must meet certain standards of quality assurance and quality control. Accreditation of wildlife forensic labs is a growing field but is not yet universal.
  • Expert Testimony: The results must be presented and explained by a qualified expert witness who can clearly articulate the science to a judge and jury.

These legal hurdles mean that simply getting a positive DNA match is not enough. The entire process, from collection to analysis to presentation, must be meticulously documented and conducted to the highest forensic standards. The lack of standardized protocols and accredited labs in many parts of the world remains a significant obstacle to the widespread use of DNA evidence in wildlife crime prosecutions.

The Sheer Scale of the Problem: A Logistical Nightmare

Finally, the sheer scale of the global shark trade presents a massive logistical challenge. Tens of millions of sharks are traded each year, with products moving through complex and often opaque international supply chains. It is simply not feasible to DNA test every shark fin or fillet that is traded. Enforcement efforts must therefore be strategic, using intelligence to target high-risk shipments and using rapid screening tools to identify those that require further investigation.

Overcoming these challenges requires a concerted global effort. It necessitates increased investment in forensic capacity building in key countries, the development of cheaper and more robust DNA testing technologies, the expansion and curation of genetic reference databases, and the strengthening of legal frameworks to ensure that the powerful evidence provided by DNA can be effectively used to bring wildlife criminals to justice.

The Future of the Fight: An Evolving Arsenal for Shark Conservation

The battle to save the world's sharks from the brink of extinction is at a critical juncture. While the challenges are immense, the rapid advancement of genetic science offers a beacon of hope. The future of this fight lies in an ever-evolving arsenal of DNA-based tools, coupled with stronger international collaboration, increased public awareness, and a commitment to holding those who profit from this destructive trade accountable.

The Rise of Portable, Real-Time DNA Analysis

The development of rapid, portable DNA testing technologies is a game-changer for law enforcement. The ability to conduct on-site analysis in a matter of hours, rather than weeks, allows customs officials to make immediate decisions about suspicious shipments, preventing illegal products from slipping through the cracks. The "DNA Toolkit" developed by researchers and deployed in places like Colombia is a prime example of this innovation. These portable labs, which can deliver results for less than a dollar per sample, are empowering officials in the very places where the illegal trade is most rampant. As these technologies become even more user-friendly, affordable, and widespread, they will create a much more formidable deterrent for traffickers.

Expanding the Power of eDNA and Genomics

Environmental DNA (eDNA) is poised to revolutionize how we monitor and manage shark populations. The ability to detect the presence of sharks simply by analyzing a water sample opens up a world of possibilities for understanding their distribution, identifying critical habitats like nursery grounds, and tracking their movements—all without having to see or catch the animals themselves. Citizen science initiatives, where recreational boaters, divers, and fishers are equipped with simple eDNA collection kits, could vastly expand the geographic scope of this monitoring, creating a global network of "ocean sentinels."

Similarly, the continued development of population genomics will provide increasingly detailed insights into the structure and connectivity of shark populations. This information is not just academically interesting; it is vital for effective conservation. By understanding which populations are most at risk and how they are connected, conservation managers can design more targeted and effective protection measures. For law enforcement, the ability to trace a seized fin not just to a species, but to a specific, vulnerable population, will provide even more powerful evidence for prosecution and help to dismantle the criminal networks that target these populations.

Strengthening International Collaboration and Capacity Building

Technology alone is not enough. The fight against the global shark trade requires a global response. This means strengthening collaboration between scientists, law enforcement agencies, and governments around the world. Initiatives that build forensic capacity in developing countries are crucial. This involves not just providing equipment, but also training local scientists and law enforcement personnel in the latest DNA techniques and forensic best practices.

International agreements like CITES will also need to be continually strengthened and rigorously enforced. As more shark species are added to the CITES appendices, the demand for reliable and efficient methods to monitor the trade will only grow. This will require sustained political will and investment from all member countries.

The Power of the Consumer and Public Awareness

Ultimately, the demand for shark products is what drives the illegal trade. Therefore, public awareness and consumer choice are powerful tools for change. The widespread mislabeling of shark meat means that consumers are often unknowingly complicit in the decline of endangered species. Studies that use DNA to expose this deception are critical for informing the public and putting pressure on the seafood industry to adopt more transparent and honest labeling practices.

Calls for mandatory species-specific labeling for all seafood products are growing louder. In the United States, for example, the FDA only requires that sellers label shark meat as "shark." Adopting more stringent labeling requirements, similar to those in Europe, would empower consumers to make informed choices and avoid products from threatened species or those with high mercury levels. When consumers demand to know what they are eating and where it came from, it creates a powerful market-based incentive for the industry to clean up its supply chains.

A Turning Tide?

The story of the shark meat trade is a sobering tale of greed, deception, and ecological devastation. But it is also a story of innovation, dedication, and a growing global movement to protect these magnificent and vital creatures. The DNA detectives at the forefront of this fight are providing the hard evidence needed to expose the truth, enforce the law, and give sharks a fighting chance. The tide has not yet turned, but with the continued advancement of science, the strengthening of international resolve, and the power of an informed public, there is hope that we can unmask the criminals, protect the vulnerable, and ensure that sharks continue to grace our oceans for generations to come. The future of these ancient predators is, in many ways, in our hands, and the choices we make—in our labs, in our courts, and in our grocery stores—will determine their fate.

Reference: