In the heart of the quantum realm, where the familiar laws of classical physics dissolve into a sea of probabilities and uncertainties, lies a phenomenon so counterintuitive it borders on the magical: quantum tunneling. This is the story of how our understanding of this bizarre quantum leap evolved from a curious theoretical anomaly into the cornerstone of a technological revolution, culminating in a Nobel Prize and paving the way for the dawn of quantum computing. It is a narrative of scientific audacity, of peering into the unseen and discovering that the strange rules of the microscopic world can be harnessed in macroscopic systems, a discovery that has reshuffled our perception of reality and ignited the race to build the most powerful computers ever imagined.
Chapter 1: The Ghost in the Machine: Unveiling Quantum Tunneling
To understand the monumental achievement of macroscopic quantum tunneling, we must first journey back to the early 20th century, a time of profound upheaval in the world of physics. The rigid, deterministic universe of Isaac Newton was beginning to crumble under the weight of new, perplexing discoveries. It was in this fertile ground of scientific revolution that the seeds of quantum mechanics were sown.
The concept of a particle, a solid, tangible object, was being challenged by the notion of wave-particle duality. This radical idea proposed that entities like electrons could behave both as discrete particles and as diffuse waves. This wave-like nature is described by a mathematical construct known as the wave function, a cornerstone of the Schrödinger equation, which was formulated by the Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger in 1926. The wave function doesn't pinpoint a particle's exact location but rather the probability of finding it in a particular place.
It was the exploration of the Schrödinger equation's implications that led to one of the most astonishing predictions in all of science. In 1927, German physicist Friedrich Hund, while studying molecular spectra, was the first to recognize the possibility of a particle "tunneling" through a potential energy barrier. Imagine throwing a ball against a wall. According to classical mechanics, if the ball doesn't have enough energy to go over the wall, it will simply bounce back. The wall represents a potential energy barrier. In the quantum world, however, the story is different. Because a particle's location is described by a probability wave, this wave doesn't just stop at the barrier; it decays exponentially through it. If the barrier is thin enough, there's a non-zero probability that the wave will exist on the other side, meaning the particle has a chance to appear on the other side of the barrier without ever having had the energy to surmount it. It's as if the ball has passed ghost-like through the solid wall.
This bizarre prediction was not just a mathematical curiosity. It provided the key to unlocking several long-standing mysteries of the physical world. In 1928, George Gamow, and independently Ronald Gurney and Edward Condon, used quantum tunneling to explain alpha decay, a type of radioactive decay where an atomic nucleus emits an alpha particle. The alpha particle is trapped within the nucleus by a strong nuclear force, creating a potential barrier. Classically, it shouldn't have enough energy to escape. Yet, through quantum tunneling, it has a small but finite probability of appearing outside the nucleus, leading to the observed radioactive decay. This was the first application of quantum tunneling and provided compelling evidence for the validity of the new quantum theory.
The implications of quantum tunneling soon rippled through other areas of physics. It was realized that this quantum leap is essential for the very fusion reactions that power our sun. The temperatures and pressures in the sun's core are actually too low for protons to overcome their electrostatic repulsion and fuse in a classical sense. It is quantum tunneling that allows them to get close enough for the strong nuclear force to take over and initiate the fusion process.
The 1950s and 1960s saw a flurry of discoveries that brought quantum tunneling from the realm of the nucleus and stars into the world of solid-state electronics. In 1957, Japanese physicist Leo Esaki, who would later share a Nobel Prize for his work, demonstrated electron tunneling in semiconductors, leading to the invention of the tunnel diode. Then, in 1960, Ivar Giaever experimentally showed that tunneling also occurs in superconductors—materials that conduct electricity with zero resistance at very low temperatures.
It was in this context of a burgeoning understanding of superconductivity that a young British physicist named Brian Josephson made a prediction in 1962 that would have profound consequences. As a 22-year-old PhD student at the University of Cambridge, Josephson theorized that pairs of superconducting electrons, known as Cooper pairs, could tunnel through a thin insulating barrier separating two superconductors, even with no voltage applied. This phenomenon, dubbed the "Josephson effect," and the device, a "Josephson junction," would become the fundamental building blocks for observing quantum mechanics on a scale never before imagined. For his theoretical predictions, Brian Josephson was awarded a share of the 1973 Nobel Prize in Physics, alongside Esaki and Giaever.
The discovery of the Josephson effect was a pivotal moment. It demonstrated a macroscopic quantum phenomenon, where the quantum behavior of a vast number of Cooper pairs could be described by a single collective wave function. This opened the door to a tantalizing question: if a large collection of particles in a superconductor can behave as a single quantum entity, could this entire macroscopic system, not just a single particle, exhibit quantum tunneling? This question would set the stage for a groundbreaking experiment that would take place two decades later.
Chapter 2: The Theorist's Vision: Anthony Leggett and the Quantum Whispers of Large Objects
The journey from the microscopic world of single-particle tunneling to the macroscopic realm, where entire systems behave quantum mechanically, was not a straight path. It required a theoretical visionary who could bridge the conceptual gap between the two. That visionary was British-American physicist Anthony Leggett.
In the late 1970s and early 1980s, Leggett, who would later receive the 2003 Nobel Prize in Physics for his pioneering work on superfluidity, turned his attention to a profound question at the heart of quantum mechanics: where does the quantum world end and the classical world begin? Quantum mechanics had been spectacularly successful at describing the behavior of atoms and subatomic particles. But the world we experience every day, the macroscopic world of bouncing balls and solid walls, is governed by the seemingly deterministic laws of classical physics. Schrödinger's famous thought experiment involving a cat that is simultaneously alive and dead in a box was intended to highlight the absurdity of applying quantum principles to large-scale objects.
Leggett, however, was not so quick to dismiss the idea. He wondered if it might be possible to observe quantum effects, like superposition and tunneling, in systems that were large enough to be seen and manipulated, bridging the gap between the microscopic and the macroscopic. He proposed that superconducting circuits incorporating Josephson junctions were the ideal candidates for such an experiment. The reasoning was that the collective behavior of the trillions of Cooper pairs in a superconductor, all described by a single macroscopic wave function, could act as a single quantum "particle." This macroscopic "particle" would be the collective state of the entire circuit.
In a seminal 1981 paper co-authored with his student Amir Caldeira, Leggett laid the theoretical groundwork for what would become known as Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling (MQT). A key challenge they addressed was the problem of "dissipation" or "decoherence." A macroscopic system is inevitably in contact with its environment. This interaction, which can be thought of as a form of friction, can introduce noise and disrupt the delicate quantum coherence needed for tunneling to occur. It was widely believed that this environmental coupling would be the death knell for any attempt to observe quantum effects in large systems.
This is where the Caldeira-Leggett model came into play. The model provided a theoretical framework for understanding and quantifying the effects of dissipation on quantum tunneling. It treated the environment as a "bath" of an infinite number of harmonic oscillators coupled to the quantum system of interest. Their calculations showed that while dissipation does indeed suppress quantum tunneling, it doesn't necessarily eliminate it entirely. Under the right conditions—specifically, at extremely low temperatures to minimize thermal fluctuations and with very weak coupling to the environment—the macroscopic quantum state could indeed tunnel through a potential barrier.
Leggett's theoretical work was a beacon for experimentalists. It not only suggested that MQT was possible but also provided a roadmap for how to look for it. The theory predicted a specific experimental signature: as the temperature of the system is lowered, the rate at which the system escapes from a metastable state via thermal activation should decrease. However, if MQT is at play, the escape rate should eventually "bottom out" and become independent of temperature at very low temperatures. This is because the system would no longer be jumping over the barrier due to thermal energy but would instead be tunneling through it via a purely quantum mechanical process.
Leggett’s ideas were bold and, to some, heretical. They flew in the face of the conventional wisdom that quantum mechanics was solely the domain of the very small. Yet, they inspired a new generation of experimental physicists to take on the challenge of building a system that could reveal the quantum whispers of the macroscopic world. Among them was a team at the University of California, Berkeley, who would turn Leggett's theoretical vision into a stunning experimental reality.
Chapter 3: The Berkeley Breakthrough: A Macroscopic System Obeys Quantum Law
In the early 1980s, several research groups around the world were in a race to be the first to definitively observe Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling. The theoretical predictions of Anthony Leggett had ignited a fire in the experimental physics community. The challenge, however, was immense. Building a macroscopic system that was sufficiently isolated from its environment to maintain its quantum coherence was a monumental feat of engineering.
At the University of California, Berkeley, a team led by Professor John Clarke was at the forefront of this quest. Clarke, an English physicist with a reputation for meticulous experimental work, had been pioneering research on superconductors and Josephson junctions for years. His group included a brilliant French postdoctoral researcher named Michel Devoret and a resourceful graduate student named John Martinis. Together, this trio possessed the ideal blend of experience, theoretical insight, and experimental ingenuity to tackle the problem.
Their experimental setup, while conceptually based on Leggett's ideas, was a marvel of precision engineering. The heart of the experiment was a tiny superconducting circuit, about a centimeter in size, containing a Josephson junction. This junction consisted of two superconducting electrodes separated by an ultrathin insulating barrier. At extremely low temperatures, just a fraction of a degree above absolute zero, the electrons in the superconducting circuit form Cooper pairs, and these pairs can tunnel across the insulating barrier of the Josephson junction.
The circuit was designed in such a way that the collective state of the Cooper pairs—the macroscopic quantum "particle"—was trapped in a potential well. This "well" was a state of zero voltage across the junction. Classically, the system should remain in this zero-voltage state indefinitely unless it is given enough energy to overcome the potential barrier and transition to a state with a finite voltage.
However, quantum mechanics, as predicted by Leggett, offered another escape route: MQT. The Berkeley team's goal was to observe the system tunneling out of this zero-voltage state. To do this, they had to overcome the formidable challenge of environmental noise. Stray electromagnetic radiation from the environment could easily provide enough energy for the system to jump over the barrier via thermal activation, masking the subtle effect of quantum tunneling. The team went to extraordinary lengths to shield their experiment from any external interference, designing a setup that meticulously filtered out stray signals.
In their experiments, conducted between 1984 and 1985, they would apply a weak current to the Josephson junction and carefully monitor the voltage across it. Since quantum tunneling is a probabilistic process, they had to repeat the measurement thousands of times and plot the results statistically to determine the "escape rate" – how quickly the system transitioned from the zero-voltage state to a finite-voltage state.
The results were a stunning confirmation of Leggett's predictions. As they lowered the temperature of the experiment, the escape rate initially decreased, as expected for thermal activation. But then, something remarkable happened. Below a certain crossover temperature, the escape rate flattened out and became constant, independent of any further decrease in temperature. This was the smoking gun for Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling. The system was no longer being "kicked" over the barrier by thermal energy; it was passing through it in a purely quantum mechanical fashion.
But the Berkeley team didn't stop there. They performed another crucial experiment that solidified their findings. They probed the energy levels of their macroscopic system by irradiating it with microwaves. They found that the system could only absorb microwaves of specific frequencies, which corresponded to discrete, quantized energy levels. This was akin to how an atom can only absorb photons of specific energies corresponding to the energy gaps between its electron shells. Their macroscopic circuit was behaving like a giant, "artificial atom."
The discovery of both Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling and the quantization of energy levels in a macroscopic circuit was a watershed moment in physics. It demonstrated, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the bizarre rules of quantum mechanics were not confined to the microscopic world. A system large enough to be seen and touched could, under the right conditions, behave as a single coherent quantum entity. For their groundbreaking work, John Clarke, Michel Devoret, and John Martinis were awarded the 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics. Their experiment had not only opened a new window into the fundamental nature of reality but had also laid the indispensable groundwork for a technology that was, at the time, little more than a theoretical dream: the quantum computer.
Chapter 4: From Artificial Atoms to Qubits: The Dawn of Superconducting Quantum Computing
The demonstration of Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling was more than just a beautiful confirmation of a fundamental quantum principle; it was the spark that ignited a new field of applied physics: superconducting quantum computing. The discovery that a macroscopic electrical circuit could behave like an artificial atom, with quantized energy levels, provided the essential ingredient for building a quantum bit, or "qubit"—the fundamental unit of a quantum computer.
A classical computer bit can exist in one of two states: 0 or 1. A qubit, on the other hand, can exist in a superposition of both 0 and 1 simultaneously, thanks to the principles of quantum mechanics. This ability, along with another quantum phenomenon called entanglement, is what gives quantum computers their immense potential power.
The artificial atoms created by the Berkeley team were the perfect candidates for qubits. The two lowest energy levels of the superconducting circuit could be designated as the |0⟩ and |1⟩ states of the qubit. The Josephson junction, the key component in the MQT experiments, was crucial for this. A simple electrical circuit made of just an inductor and a capacitor would have evenly spaced energy levels. This would make it impossible to isolate just two levels to act as a qubit, as any energy input would excite transitions between multiple levels. The Josephson junction, however, acts as a non-linear inductor, which creates an anharmonic oscillator with unevenly spaced energy levels. This allows for the precise targeting of the transition between the |0⟩ and |1⟩ states with microwaves of a specific frequency, without disturbing the other energy levels.
This is precisely how superconducting qubits are controlled. By applying carefully crafted microwave pulses to the circuit, scientists can put the qubit into a superposition of |0⟩ and |1⟩, rotate its state, and perform quantum logic gates—the building blocks of quantum algorithms. The microwave photons act as the "fingers" that manipulate the quantum information stored in the artificial atom.
The first experimental demonstration of a superconducting qubit was achieved in 1999, building directly on the foundations laid by the MQT experiments. This led to the development of various types of superconducting qubits, with names like "charge qubits," "flux qubits," and "phase qubits." One of the most successful and widely used designs today is the "transmon" qubit, which is a variation of the charge qubit that is less sensitive to environmental noise, leading to longer coherence times—the length of time a qubit can maintain its quantum state.
John Martinis, one of the laureates of the 2025 Nobel Prize for MQT, went on to become a leading figure in the development of superconducting quantum computers. In 2014, he and his research group were recruited by Google to lead their quantum computing efforts. This collaboration culminated in a landmark achievement in 2019: the demonstration of "quantum supremacy" (a term now often replaced by "quantum advantage"). Martinis's team built a quantum processor, named Sycamore, with 53 superconducting qubits. They showed that Sycamore could perform a specific complex calculation in just 200 seconds, a task that they estimated would take the world's most powerful classical supercomputer 10,000 years to complete. This was a powerful demonstration of the potential of quantum computing and a direct descendant of the MQT experiments of the 1980s.
Today, superconducting qubits are at the heart of many of the most advanced quantum computers being developed by companies like Google, IBM, and Rigetti. These machines are still in their infancy, and significant challenges remain, particularly in scaling up the number of qubits and improving their coherence times. The very same environmental noise that the Berkeley team fought so hard to eliminate in their MQT experiment remains a major obstacle for building fault-tolerant quantum computers.
Nevertheless, the progress has been astonishing. The ability to engineer macroscopic quantum systems with such precision has opened up a new frontier in science and technology. The legacy of the discovery of Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling is not just a deeper understanding of the quantum world, but the very real prospect of a future where quantum computers solve problems that are currently intractable, from designing new materials and medicines to revolutionizing artificial intelligence and breaking complex codes.
Chapter 5: Echoes of the Quantum Leap: The Broader Impact of Macroscopic Quantum Phenomena
The discovery of Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling and the subsequent development of superconducting qubits have undoubtedly had their most profound impact on the field of quantum computing. However, the echoes of this quantum leap have resonated far beyond, influencing a wide range of scientific and technological domains. The ability to create and control macroscopic quantum systems has provided us with unprecedented tools for sensing and measurement, pushing the boundaries of what we can detect and understand about the world around us.
One of the most significant applications to emerge from the physics of Josephson junctions is the Superconducting Quantum Interference Device, or SQUID. A SQUID is an incredibly sensitive magnetometer capable of detecting minuscule magnetic fields, thousands of times weaker than the Earth's magnetic field. It operates on the principles of the Josephson effect and flux quantization in a superconducting loop. Even a tiny change in the magnetic flux passing through the SQUID loop causes a measurable change in the current flowing through its Josephson junctions.
SQUIDs have found a vast array of applications across science and medicine. In medicine, they are the key technology behind magnetoencephalography (MEG), a non-invasive technique for imaging brain activity. By detecting the extremely weak magnetic fields generated by the electrical currents of neurons, MEG can provide a real-time map of brain function, offering invaluable insights into epilepsy, Alzheimer's disease, and other neurological disorders.
In geoscience, SQUIDs are used for mineral exploration and for monitoring seismic activity. Their extreme sensitivity allows them to detect subtle variations in the Earth's magnetic field that can indicate the presence of ore deposits or the precursors to an earthquake. In fundamental physics, SQUIDs have been used in experiments to search for exotic particles like axions, which are candidates for dark matter, and to perform high-precision tests of fundamental physical laws.
The principles behind MQT and superconducting circuits have also led to the development of other ultrasensitive detectors and precision measurement tools. For example, these circuits can be used as quantum amplifiers that can boost extremely weak signals without adding the noise that plagues classical amplifiers. This is crucial for a wide range of applications, from radio astronomy, where scientists are trying to detect faint signals from the early universe, to the readout of quantum computers themselves.
Furthermore, the ability to engineer "artificial atoms" with customizable properties has revolutionized the field of quantum optics. Scientists can now design and build superconducting circuits that mimic the behavior of natural atoms, but with properties that can be tuned at will. This has opened up new avenues for studying the fundamental interactions between light and matter and for exploring novel quantum phenomena in regimes that are not accessible with natural atoms.
The research into MQT has also had a profound philosophical impact, forcing physicists to confront deep questions about the nature of reality. The fact that a macroscopic object can exist in a superposition of states and tunnel through barriers challenges our intuitive, classical understanding of the world. It suggests that the boundary between the quantum and classical realms is not a sharp dividing line but rather a fuzzy, context-dependent transition. Anthony Leggett's work, which inspired the MQT experiments, continues to fuel research into the foundations of quantum mechanics and the quantum measurement problem.
In essence, the discovery of Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling was not an isolated event. It was a gateway to a new level of control over the quantum world. It demonstrated that the strangeness of quantum mechanics is not just a feature of the subatomic realm but can be brought into our macroscopic world and harnessed for practical purposes. From the quest to build a universal quantum computer to the development of life-saving medical imaging technologies, the legacy of that Nobel-winning discovery is a testament to the power of curiosity-driven research and the endless wonders that await us at the frontiers of science. The ability to hear and interpret the quantum whispers of large objects has given us a new voice with which to speak the language of the universe, and the conversation has only just begun.
Reference:
- https://www.bluequbit.io/quantum-tunneling
- https://pubs.aip.org/physicstoday/article/55/8/44/412308/The-Early-History-of-Quantum-Tunneling-Molecular
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_tunnelling
- https://www.deeplook.ir/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/History-Quantum-Tunneling.pdf
- https://www.scribd.com/presentation/56544190/Qpres-Squid
- https://web.physics.ucsb.edu/~martinisgroup/classnotes/finland/LesHouchesJunctionPhysics.pdf
- https://galileo-unbound.blog/2022/11/06/a-short-history-of-quantum-tunneling/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josephson_effect
- https://qt.eu/quantum-principles/computing/superconducting-circuits
- https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2025/popular-information/
- https://www.nobelprize.org/uploads/2025/10/advanced-physicsprize2025.pdf
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_James_Leggett
- https://physics.aps.org/articles/v18/170
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRnXr7SQXfk
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_dissipation
- https://arxiv.org/pdf/0812.2520
- https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/quantum-computing
- https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/science/why-did-macroscopic-quantum-tunnelling-win-the-2025-physics-nobel/article70135609.ece
- https://news.berkeley.edu/2025/10/07/john-clarke-uc-berkeley-emeritus-professor-awarded-2025-nobel-prize-in-physics/
- https://www.britannica.com/biography/John-Clarke-physicist
- https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/science/meet-clarke-devoret-and-martinis-the-2025-nobel-laureates-who-brought-quantum-tunnelling-to-life/articleshow/124360033.cms?from=mdr
- https://www.spinquanta.com/news-detail/josephson-junctions-in-superconducting-qubits
- https://thequantuminsider.com/2025/10/07/clarke-devoret-and-martinis-win-2025-nobel-prize-in-physics-for-revealing-quantum-effects-in-macroscopic-circuits/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconducting_quantum_computing
- https://www.energy.gov/science/ascr/articles/artificial-atoms-power-novel-quantum-processor-architecture
- https://pennylane.ai/qml/demos/tutorial_sc_qubits
- https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.260601
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDyKg6irmf0
- https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.260601
- https://www.vedantu.com/physics/josephson-effect
- http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Solids/Squid.html